IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 250/2007
IN THE MATTER OF:
NANDINI SUNDAR
VERSUS
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH & ANR.
WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO. 119/2007
AND IN THE MATTER OF:
KARTAM JOGA
VERSUS
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
CONTEMPT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 140/2012
AND IN THE MATTER OF:
NANDINI SUNDAR
VERSUS
SHRI SUNIL KUMAR
COMPREHENSIVE NOTE ON THE ISSUES INVOLVED AND A RESPONSE WHICH THE STATE’S AFFIDAVIT 30.08.2024 SIMPLY DOES NOT ADDRESS
The writ petitions were filed against the state policy of arming civilians and militarizing the districts of Bastar, Sukma, Bijapur and Dantewada in the state of Chhattisgarh, which resulted in an exponentially rising spiral of devastation. This case may broadly be divided into five sections:
I. This Court’s indictment of a counter insurgency policy of using state sponsored vigilantes and SPOs, in its judgment reported as Nandini Sundar v. State of Chhattisgarh (2011) 7 SCC 547, and the brazen violation of the same by the State of Chhattisgarh thereafter.
This is reiterated in the State’s Affidavit dated 30.08.2024 filed following this Hon’ble Court’s directions of 16.7.2024 for a status update, purportedly showing compliance of order dated 05.07.2011
II. The extent of human rights violations in Chhattisgarh and the State’s failure/inability to redress the same.
III. This Court’s directions to the CBI to investigate the incidents of violence (arson, rape and murder) in three villages of Chhattisgarh, namely Timmapuram, Morpalli and Tadmetla by the SPOs as well as the violent attack on Swami Agnivesh, and subsequent developments.
IV. Role of the National Human Rights Commission.
V. Proposed Rehabilitative measures - Survey and Independent Monitoring.