Thursday, June 6, 2013

24 February 2006, Mahendra Karma leading Salwa Judum rally in Konta

KR Pisda, Collector Dantewada and Mahendra Karma at Salwa Judum rally, 24.2.2006 (photos taken by un-named local journalist)


Mahendra Karma accompanied by Soyam Mooka and Ram Bhuwan Kuswaha, salwa judum leaders
Special Police Officers

One of the hundreds of villages burnt by salwa judum (photo taken by student whose village was burnt)
woman forcibly brought to salwa judum camp, corruption in rations (ICI, May 2006)


Saturday, June 1, 2013

On the Killing of Mahendra Karma



Any keen observer of Chhattisgarh could have foreseen Saturday’s deadly Maoist attack at Jeeram ghat in Bastar, though not perhaps its magnitude.  Mahendra Karma’s death was long expected, though politicians like him who flirt with the dark side usually have enough security to keep themselves safe.  With a string of killings of Maoist leaders under their belt, the security establishment thought the Maoists could be written off. However, like other insurgents elsewhere have always done, the Maoists scaled back only to strike hard.
Calls for more concerted military action ignore what has actually been happening. In fact, in recent months, the security forces have ratcheted up operations, densely carpeting Maoist strongholds with CRPF camps. In the 46 km stretch between Dornapal and Chintalnar, there are now 7 camps, with the latest two, Burkapal and Minpa, having come up in the last fortnight.  Overnight, large stretches of forest were cleared in Burkapal, for a helipad on one side and a CRPF camp on the other, and the question of forest clearances for this, or any other security installation, is never even seen as an issue. The biodiverse forests of Bastar – which are national treasures - have been one of the biggest casualties of this war, which rages across trees, roads, transformers, schools and the bodies of men, women and even little children.

On the Media's Need for Whipping Boys


I am sick to death of TV panel discussions which ask whether human rights activists are soft on the Maoists, romanticise the Maoists and so on. Why doesn't someone ask if our honourable politicians and security experts are soft on police torture and extra judicial killings?
Television is not interested in a serious discussion - all they want are whipping boys. The sight of Arnab Goswami mocking Prof. Haragopal for giving an "academic analysis" was especially nauseating, compounded by his showing off about "Emily Durkheim" (sic!). Why bother to have a panel at all,  if only hysterical calls for the army to be sent in to wipe out the Maoists count as 'analysis', and every other viewpoint is seen as biased?